Skip to main content
UNSW Sydney Logo
Teaching
Search
  • About
  • Teaching
    • New to teaching
    • Inclusive teaching and equity
    • Educational design
    • Assessment and feedback
    • Evaluating education
    • AI in teaching and learning
    • More...
  • Educational Technology
    • Support
    • Training
    • EdTech resources
    • Media & immersive
  • Events & News
    • Upcoming events
    • Recent news
    • Event recordings & resources
    • Subscribe to education news
  • Awards
    • Awards
    • Fellowships
    • Gathering evidence of your teaching practice
  • Professional Development
    • Beginning to Teach (BTT)
    • Teaching Accelerator Program
    • Foundations of L&T (FULT)
    • Course Design Institute (CDI)
    • Program Level Approach to Assessment
    • Self-paced learning
    • Academic mentoring
  • Contact & Support
    • Education contacts and support
    • UNSW's Teaching Commons
  1. Teaching
  2. Teaching for learning
  3. Blended and online
  4. Evaluating TELT

Vision for the TELT Evaluation Framework

Technology Enhanced Learning and Teaching (TELT)

Vision

To devise a "living" evaluation framework that affords an iterative refinement process to underpin:

  • All TELT technology selections and developments
  • Efficient tracking of the trajectory of success (and failure) of educational technologies used across faculties and over time
  • Enhancement of the divergent L & T approaches and practices in online learning at UNSW

TELT Evaluation Framework Downloads

Please access the comprehensive documents below to learn more about the TELT Evaluation Framework

Background research and methodology:

  • Evaluation of the TELT Platform—Essential Elements and Methodologies
  • TELT Evaluation—Stage 3: A Multi-Definitional Approach to Educational Technology Evaluation at UNSW / Stage 3 Evaluation Criteria

Implementation:

  • S. Quinton (2010). TELT Faculty Policy Plans and Strategies Construction Kit. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales, Learning and Teaching @ UNSW. The Faculty TELT Policy, Plans and Strategies Construction Kit (the “Construction Kit”) is an easy-to-use manual that will assist Faculties to easily create tailored TELT Policy, Plans and Strategies as guided by the principles and goals set out in the TELT Evaluation Platform Reports, and to work towards a future where TELT-enabled curriculum, learning, and teaching enhancement and support are incorporated as crucial components of each Faculty’s long-term goals and vision. Please note, the TELT Faculty Policy Plans and Strategies Construction Kit is a secured link. Please contact us by email [LINK TO COME] to obtain the username and password to access this file.

Survey instrument refinement:

  • TELT Evaluation Framework—Refinement of TELT Survey Instrument (1st iteration)
  • TELT Evaluation Framework—Refinement of TELT Survey Instrument (2nd iteration)

Pilot evaluation results:

  • Brief summary of evaluation pilots (Elluminate), S2, 2010
  • Brief summary of evaluation pilots (Moodle), S2, 2010
  • Brief summary of evaluation pilots (Moodle + Wikispaces), S1, 2010

Why the need for a TELT Evaluation Framework?

Rationale and argument for devising a generic evaluation framework:

  1. Lack of availability of a widely recognised framework
  2. The need to avoid the many bias inherent in most frameworks
  3. The need to position L&T at the top of a hierarchy of evaluation criteria consistent with the TELT vision
  4. Identify the principles and models on which the framework is to be established.

An extensive literature search conducted over several months has confirmed the difficulty in identifying a comprehensive, generic approach and methodologies for facilitating the selection and evaluation of the effectiveness of educational technology applications and solutions that focus exclusively on serving the needs of learning and teaching.

Pedagogical concerns over the actual learning effectiveness of various eLearning applications have increased alongside the meteoric rise in eLearning popularity and implementation. The chief criticism is that the increasingly feature-rich technological platforms are not properly developed for an appropriate learning context, often improperly integrated and under-utilized, and in many situations simply become an expensive means of indexing ordinary content, adding little educational value.

The TELT Evaluation Framework is thus being developed as a comprehensive, flexible and continuous approach to assess and evaluate the suitability of different educational technologies for use within the TELT Platform, as guided by informed Learning and Teaching practice and research.

What is the TELT Evaluation Framework?

For UNSW, the priority for its TELT evaluation strategy is to devise a theoretical framework from which to assess the suitability of selected educational technologies for inclusion in the TELT platform. The Evaluation Framework is an extensive, multi-faceted tool for providing an evidence-based assessment of learning and teaching technologies that may be used by the University.

Once a technology has passed through a three stage evaluation process and been approved for general use, a perpetual, iterative process of evaluation is initiated to assess the educational effectiveness of that technology in terms of the depth of student comprehension and the measurable improvements to the teaching and learning processes.

What the TELT Evaluation Framework is not

The Framework is designed to be underpinned by educational and eLearning theory and to learn from and to improve on the results and experiences of other eLearning evaluations, with the aim of improving the TELT environment within the University.

We understand that some staff may misunderstand the Evaluation, perceiving it as an assessment of their skills, teaching practices, or ability. The Evaluation is focused on understanding and improving eLearning technologies now and for the future, and is thus very critical of the usability, true learning effectiveness, and integration with student learning environments.

It is not in any way intended to be an assessment of the performance or expertise of individual teaching staff.

Further information

  • See the TELT Evaluation Framework structure.

External links

  • 7 questions to ask re new technology for your business | Aide-Memoire
  • Do You WANT an LMS? Does a Learner WANT an LMS? : eLearning Technology
  • CPR Home
  • 2004 revision—A framework for the pedagogical evaluation of eLearning Environments.
  • The Present and Future of Standards for E-Learning Technologies
  • Idealware: Why SharePoint Scares Me
  • Evaluating E-learning: A Guide to the Evaluation of E-learning (pdf)
  • A Dialogical, Story-Based Evaluation Tool: The Most Significant Change Technique
  • Assessment and Evaluation—Evaluating online courses using SELT
  • Blended and online
    • Examples from UNSW
    • Aim & vision
    • Teaching online
    • Selecting technologies
    • Planning & designing courses
    • Evaluating courses
    • Evaluating TELT
      • Vision for evaluation framework
      • Structure of evaluation framework
    • Using digital media
  • Group work
  • Teaching diverse groups

Events & news

QILT Symposium and NSW Higher Education Summit
Never waste a good crisis: Why higher education needs a unified approach to curriculum transformation in the AI era
More
Back to top
  • Print
  • Home
  • About
  • Teaching
  • Educational Technology
  • Events & news
  • Awards
  • Professional development
  • Contacts

AUTHORISED BY PRO VICE-CHANCELLOR EDUCATION
UNSW CRICOS Provider Code: 00098G, TEQSA Provider ID: PRV12055, ABN: 57 195 873 179
Teaching at UNSW, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia Telephone 9385 5989

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY
UNSW respectfully acknowledges the Bidjigal, Biripi, Dharug, Gadigal, Gumbaynggirr, Ngunnawal and Wiradjuri peoples, whose unceded lands we are privileged to learn, teach and work on our UNSW campuses. We honour the Elders of these Nations, as well as broader Nations that we walk together with, past and present, and acknowledge their ongoing connection to culture, community and Country.
- The Uluru Statement
 


  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright & Disclaimer
  • Accessibility
  • Complaints
  • Site Map
  • Site Feedback
Page last updated: Friday 10 January 2025